These authors all give a great explanation in their beliefs
of UFO’s. They all do not completely ignore that fact that there is a possibility
of potential existing UFO’s. Some do not believe it more than others. For
example Condon believes that if the existence of UFO’s is real within the last
21 years, it would have created more talk than it has in reality. It should be
on federal level and should not be kept in secrecy. He also explains that since
it is not very valid it should not be taught to children because it can disturb
learning when young. Hynek believes that we as readers should not give up the possibility
of UFO existence. That even these abductees may not be lying and can be real. Just
because the evidence is not strong, the possibility is still out there. It just
needs more scientific evidence. Alike Hynek, Paynter’s argument does not single
out the possibility of UFO’s but believes if people were going to support this
issue at least have valid evidence not just testimony and objects that are
supposedly alien objects. These alien objects are not even proved to be
accurate. So if these believers can find hard proof then it would be perfectly
fine to support the idea. I personally agree with Paynter because you can’t
single out any possibility because things may be real but it just needs strong
evidence.
No comments:
Post a Comment