This is a classic argument of healthy eating in today’s
society. It is basically one author giving her view on supporting what the
child is exposed to from food marketers and as for the other author, he or she
is giving the opposing view. So in this situation Wootan is explaining that
yes, the parents may be the one to blame for poor eating choices for them and
their children, but she also points out that the marketing from food companies
and franchises aren’t helping as well. She morally has a good point but then
again I believe that it really does focus on the parents’ will. That is why I agree
more with Liodice because she is technically correct. Everyone has their right
to freedom of speech and press. So they can push any topic without much
restraint on what they are trying to advertise. They are simply doing their job
and trying to make a living. It may not be an honest living, but the public
does not have to give in to their campaigning.
No comments:
Post a Comment